Commissioners of The Internet... The Part Three - 'Criminal manner of communication'.
Table of contents:
- 'Internet Commissioners';
- 'Brigade';
- 'Criminal manner of communication';
- 'Commissars of the Internet, Part Four...';
- 'Cui prodest hoc ?'.
# The political spectrum of the brigade - the 'fine-comb principle'
The
permanent members of the brigade of any popular web forum introduce
themselves to be adherents of some party or movement, distributed across
the entire post-Soviet political spectrum, excluding its liberal part.
On every forum there will definitely be an anti-Semitic nationalist,
Zionist a communist and several characters who claim that they voted for
Grybouskaite, but were disappointed in her because of her lack of
loyalty to Putin, Lukashenko or Yanukovych. Among others, there will
definitely be a character on the forum with extreme leftist views, who
vehemently denounces the Europa, the USA, Capitalism, but at the same
time never criticizes Grybauskaite, Putin, Lukashenko, Yanukovych and
their regimes, which is somewhat illogical for an ordinary 'leftist'.
The
views of the brigade members supposedly diverge on minor tactical
issues, but they are all invariably united on the key and basic ones -
absolute loyalty to Post Soviet Regimes, the “prosperity” of Post Soviet
Countries under their leadership, harmfulness of the democrats, the
need to continue the information war, right up to the merger of the
Baltic Region, Ukraina with the Republic of Belarus and Russia, hatred
of human rights defenders, freedom of speech, democratic and liberal
values /in addition to liberalism and democracy to any of signs of
belonging ethnic, racial, place of permanent residence, party and other
signs of the distribution of material wealth and privileges/. I would
call this political positioning of the brigade the fine-comb principle.
Any
new person, with any political beliefs, who accidentally looks at the
forum, finds himself caught between the prongs of this comb. Each of the
members of the brigade close to him in his views will declare partial
similarity of their beliefs, but will certainly correct the newcomer
about the unshakable values of the brigade. Anyone who undertakes to
criticize autoritary/totaritary regims post soviet space, runs the risk
of receiving unpleasant lectures from the brigade both 'on the right'
and 'on the left', from the character 'a paid-up simpleton-fascist' to
the character 'an exquisite patriot-ex-Belyatsky'.
Communist,
moderate liberal-statist, Yavlinist, a man of difficult fate, who has
reconsidered his beliefs, a modest and reasonable mother of a family
from somewhere in Florida, always loyal to the USSR moral and legal
norms of Judaism, a fawned simpleton from the people, an anti-Semite, an
intellectual, a “former dissident - Siberian”, today dreaming of
hanging human rights activists from street lamps - these are the usual
types of the brigade on web forums. But all of them necessarily and
invariably revere post-Soviet regimes and their punitive authorities, as
well as all the “active measures” of the authorities. On other points,
the brigadiers have minimal differences, the basis for simulating
discussions among their own. If the opponent persists in defending his
beliefs, then the team will collectively apply more sophisticated
methods of influence against him.
# Criminal manner of communication
Squabbles, provocations,
obscene language - all this is the norm from the life of web brigads.
The methods of their work with opponent ladies who are trying to argue
reasonedly with the texts of the “team members” are unique.
To
their address on this occasion the names of their body parts and genital
organs are listed, the opponent’s to lack of a sexual partner, her
deformity, old age, excessive obesity, prostitution, etc. are indicated.
For example, the typical and most harmless remark:
“The State
Security Service is State Security. A noble task. Security this is
generally wonderful. Living in a state of danger is bad, adn which this
cannot argue with that. Therefore and taking care of the security of the
state as a whole is a very important and necessary task. And if someone
from these “State Security Services” you got between the legs, so much
so that it still can’t calm down, so it’s a pity that it didn’t kill.
After all, your breed doesn’t care about looking decent. Intrusive,
impudent, stubbornly in your eyes, like an advertisement for sanitary
pads. Apparently, the GB dealt with you for such disgusting behavior.
And let them continue to deal with you all. You, Anastasia, are a
dinosaur. And you must die out.”
And here’s another very typical speech from a member of the brigade:
“You
fucking idiot, are you cumming here at the monitor or something. Can’t
you do it any other way? There’s no guy? But who needs you, you idiot.
So you’re stuck here from morning to evening. At least some kind of
communication for you. You’re here pouring out your poison (or rather,
sexual dissatisfaction). Get yourself a man and and let him fuck you
yourself properly, you’ll see you become smarter, although the latter is
in question.”
And so on, in a row, with dozens and hundreds of
similar texts under different nicknames. It is curious that after a week
or two of filling the forum with similar posts, most of which we do not
quote here for reasons of decency, the same group of authors who
harassed a female opponent usually writes about her a complaining
collective letter to the site administrator - That all of them,
certified 'intelligent regular readers' were cruelly persecuted by the
very participant in the discussions to whom such texts were dedicated.
Most
of the real women participants in the discussions are not able to
withstand such a collective onslaught of the brigade for long and leave
the discussions.
# Systematic way away of heated discussions to the side
The
members of the brigade are fluent in simple thieves' techniques (“look,
the bird is flying”), necessary to distract the attention of the
“object” for the purpose of subsequent robbery (in this case, taking the
discussion into the boundless), and unaccustomed to the thieves' world,
the "antillekhents" fall for these tricks, to the great joy of the
entire brigade. Among other participants in the discussions, except for
brigade, such behavior practically does not occur.
This trick
consists of one of the brigade members throwing in a deliberately false
thesis, forcing the enemy to scour for sources that refute this lie. For
example, that Raoul Mercader, Trotsky’s murderer, never had anything to
do with the OGPU-NKVD. After the person who expressed this idea is
provided with a dozen references that Mercader received the title of
Hero of the Soviet Union and was buried in the USSR, the character is
not at all embarrassed; on the contrary, he already claims that Pol
Pot’s Khmer Rouge had nothing to do with communism. Having received
links to refute this, the character states that not a single Czech died
under Soviet tanks in Prague in 1968. Next comes his statement that the
victims of Stalin’s repressions were less than a million people,
everything else was invented by liberals. Having received factual
refutations of each of his false statements, a month later the brigadier
character will repeat them again, in the same order and in the same
expressions. This trick works very successfully when the brigadier
throws in “specific information,” say, about life in Lithuania: “A movie
ticket there costs 20 litas.” If Real residents of Lithuania and
brigadiers allegedly living there are actively involved in the
discussion, at well already for a full day there is a discussion about
the cost of a ticket to a Lithuanian cinema...
Or the thesis is
abandoned: “Lukashenko does not and never has had anything to do with
the KGB, he is not a special officer.” Links neither to the website of
the Belarusian President, nor to the official biography of the President
of the Belarusian Republic, nor to his own interviews will help. The
author of the “misinformation”, in response to all the refutations, will
increasingly insult the person who has undertaken to argue with him,
and will repeat his “misinformation” more and more persistently.
For
example, a lady, a permanent member of the brigade team on one of the
forums, positioning herself as a resident of Lithuania, but regularly
calling to “pray for Lukashenko,” declares the supposed restrictions for
Soviet Jews in Lithuania, who are actually occupy today lot number of
responsible public and official positions:
'What the tsarist
authorities in Russia did for many years with the Bans of Settlement and
bans of education for Jews, Demakrats are still doing in Lithuania. No,
they will allow you to study. Just pay. But it’s unlikely will succeed
to get a job, or at a government post. Go to business, pay your taxes.
You are welcome. Therefore there are Soviet Jews here, but there is no
Jewish question. And there is no Zionism either. Well, imagine if the
Jews rushed to sell off Lithuania, like our 'democrats', lining their
pockets and cursing Brazauskas. They are wise the Lithuanians.'
Let's
leave this passage to the conscience of the "everycompatriots". It
doesn’t matter what you write here, the main thing is to divert the
discussion away from dangerous for dictatur regims topics.
# Web team awareness.
First of all, the team’s ability
to instantly find quotes from an opponent’s old remarks on the forums is
amazing, even if this quote is a year and a half ago, and it may not
even be in the site’s archives anymore. Many brigadiers strive to find
out as much personal information about their opponent as possible. For
this purpose, “intelligence surveys” of critical opponents are regularly
conducted; a number of questions are casually asked about family,
university graduation, work, region of residence, favorite places or
acquaintances. For unknown reasons, a random forum “interlocutor” from
the team can easily identify and indicate to you the country and city
from which you are writing, even on those sites where it is impossible
to see the IP code.
# Team games
Another characteristic
feature of brigadiers of the same type is their penchant for team games.
They invariably support each other in discussions, ask each other
leading questions, clarify each other’s answers, even if they are
positioned as strangers to each other. If they start bullying one of
their opponents, then this bullying will definitely become a team one,
with the participation of three to twenty different characters who are
invariably present on political forums at any time of the day. The
brigade's favorite technique is to accuse the opponent of insanity. It
invariably becomes collective, where each of the nicknames of the
brigade will definitely throw out one of the short remarks: “Demshiza,
paranoia, schizophrenia, clinic, persecution mania, obviously sick,
madhouse at the computer, pathological Russophobia, nervous breakdown,
severe diagnosis, amnesty in psychiatric hospital, take a sedative,
Kremlin agent..." etc., etc.
For example, a certain “lady from intellectual circles in Lithuania” reports:
'Gentlemen,
if Nastenka is prescribed a lobotomy, with your permission, I will give
the doctor a scalpel - a dull one, like Nastya herself. Well, if they
limit themselves to electric shock, then let me turn on the switch! I’ll
turn it on for a little while, for about two hours!... She, this
Anastasia, is a Russian bastard, she can even very easily fall under a
tram, of course, herself, like in that book.'
Less than three
years have passed since, on another political forum, a certain anonymous
person from the brigade declares to another woman who wrote about the
victims of the Gulag:
'Well, so much for the heap... How do you,
dear Veronica at like about a lobotomy? We to you haven't done it yet.'
It turns out that this brigade’s 'joke' is typical and cross-forum, like
many of their similar pranks.
Another option for the brigade is
to accuse the person of lying on the basis of a typo, or to start
writing with your entire close-knit group that an always perfectly
correct, polite and well-mannered opponent this is “a malicious rude
person, a troublemaker, a boor and a liar.” Thus, the brigade
collectively forms a negative image of an opponent they do want.
# Bring to one's involvement of the administration.
If all of
the listed methods of working with an opponent have been exhausted, the
team has an extreme measure in its arsenal - involving the site
administration. And thise more often than not, brigadiers simply
massively write monotonous collective complaints against their opponents
to the editor, the site administrator, or in electronic “complaint
books”, demanding the removal of certain postings or entire discussions
that they do not like, calling close access to the forums to
undesirable persons. The complaints of team on different forums coincide
verbatim. For example, both the administrator of the site DELFI.ru and
the webmaster were addressed by the team with complaints about
completely different people, but with the same text: 'This sweet couple
to did insulted and humiliated all regular participants of forum.'
Usually
the brigade accuses the opponent of what they most often do themselves.
Let us assume that most often the brigade used obscene language at the
opponent, threatening him with physical harm, and the opponent remained
correct and unperturbed. This means that in their complaints to the
administrator, the team will write that the “accused” persecuted them
all at the same time, that he is rude, foul-mouthed and threatened
everyone with violence. When there are a lot of such letters (we take
into account that the team always works collectively, and each of this
group uses several nicknames), then the number of complaints will have
an effect on any admin, even though the team members never provide
specific evidence or quotes, for lack of such.
This method is
colloquially referred to as banal collective slander of an opponent. It
is quite effective even for those forum administrators who do not yet
want to voluntarily obey the instructions of the ideological governing
bodies of the totalitar Republics. However, there are fewer and fewer
such independent administrators; they are losing their jobs one after
another and are being replaced everywhere by more obedient and compliant
ones.
# Destruction of unwanted forums.
Sometimes a purge of entire
sections of the forum is organized in which one of the brigade members
has made obvious “mistakes” or disclosed unnecessary or premature
information from the special services, and so many examples of such
activity that it is difficult to call them coincidences.
The
website vesti.ru, where quite heated discussions of current Russian
issues were held, was closed shortly after the start of the discussion,
where a number of readers accused the FSB of being responsible for the
explosions in Dagestan. The site has now been transferred to the state
television channel. On the website of the Moscow News newspaper, readers
who have established themselves as critics of Lukashenko, Putin and the
FSB are blocked from entering discussions by the new site administrator
without any explanation, despite the fact that these readers did not
violate any rules of conduct on this forum. All texts from this group
were carefully cut out by the site administrator from the archive of
discussions period over a year a half.
The search engine
rambler.ru for the keyword “lustration” recently provided a link to the
ej.ru forum with an interesting and extensive comment from a reader,
where he substantiated the need for lustration of security officers in
Russia, Belarus, Baltic countres. After his texts were quoted on another
Russian political forum, with reference to a post by a reader from
ej.ru, all archives of discussions in the Daily Journal, including the
text about lustrations, were destroyed, and the ej.ru forum itself
reformation and changed design. On many Runet forums (as an example,
DELFI.ru) there is now a painstaking and systematic change of
administrators, replace independent specialists with regime-controlled,
obedient executors of any instruction.
Riad more... >>> "Commissars of the Internet, Part Four..."
No comments:
Post a Comment